LAXMI CONSULTING BUREAU SERVICES LLP THROUGH PARTNER v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE IAS AND ANOTHER
COCP/3212/2025 · 2026-01-22
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 325 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 325 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN T 108
Laxmi Co Parkash Ba
Shri Chan Shaheri Vi
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
of order dat this Court Services L Haryana an was issued representat take an app within a copy/produ COCP-3212-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.3212 o
Date of decision : i Consulting Bureau Services LL ash Babbar Versus Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chie eri Vikas Pradhikaran, Panchkula an
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID
Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate w
Ms. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advoc for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Adv I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has b der dated 25.4.2025 (Annexure P-1) pa Court in CWP-11226-2025 titled as ces LLP, through partner (Om Park ana and others”, whereby the petition w ssued “…to respondent No.2 (compete ntation dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure appropriate action thereon, in acco a period of eight weeks from roduction of this order….”
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3212 of 2025 (O & M) ision :-22.01.2026 es LLP through partner Om …..Petitioner , Chief Administrator, Haryana ula and another …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate with Advocate te for ll, Advocate for the respondents. n has been filed alleging violation 1) passed by a Division Bench of d as “Laxmi Consulting Bureau Parkash Babbar) vs. State of ition was disposed of and direction petent authority) to look into the xure P-6) of the petitioner and accordance with law, preferably from the date of receipt of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.23 18.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
submits tha have passe Administra has been ac paid interest 14.10.2025 Shops-cum
produced b Copy there to tag/pagin
Writ Court with while respondent and the sam
by learned
disposed of
January 22 Vijay Asija
Whether spe Whether Rep
COCP-3212-2025 (O & M) At the very outset, learned c its that in pursuance to the directions o passed a Speaking Order dated 14.10 inistrator, HSVP, Panchkula, whereby een accepted and it has been directed interest @5.5% per annum. It is subm .2025 it has also been directed that th cum-Offices (SCOs). Copy of the aforesaid Speaki ced by the learned counsel for the resp thereof is supplied to learned counsel /paginate the same at appropriate place
Learned counsel for the petiti Court order dated 25.4.2025 (Annexu while passing a Speaking Order ndent-authority, nothing survives in th he same may be disposed of. In view of the above noted fact arned counsel for the petitioner, the p sed of. Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, sh 2, 2026
Asija
er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No
2 rned counsel for the respondents ions of this Court, the respondents 14.10.2025 passed by the Chief ereby the claim of the petitioner irected that the petitioner shall be is submitted that vide order dated that the petitioner be allotted two Speaking order dated 14.10.2025 he respondents is taken on record. ounsel for the petitioner. Registry place in the paper-book. petitioner submits that since the nnexure P-1) has been complied rder dated 14.10.2025 by the s in the present contempt petition ed facts and the submissions made , the present contempt petition is any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.23 18.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document