Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:332] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13623/2024 Naresh Kakad S/o Rekharam, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kakdo Ki Dhani, Bhimji, Police Station Baytu, District Balotara, At Present Resident Of Khema Baba Colony, Bhopji, Police Station Baytu, District Balotara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 03/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.11/2024 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (Alwar), District Alwar for the offences under Sections 420 & 120-B of IPC and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:332] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13623/2024]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. It is alleged against the petitioner that he received amount of Rs.24,95,713/- and that amount was transferred from the account of complainant. It is alleged against the petitioner that he opened the bank account in his name and received the said amount in his bank account. It is mentioned in the complaint that amount of Rs.1,10,00,000/- was transferred from the complainant's account at different accounts. The criminal record of the petitioner also shows that the petitioner is involved in similar nature of cases in FIR registered at Police Station Palanpur, Taluka Gujarat and Khadeshwar, New Mumbai. Similarly, a case under Section 307 IPC at Police Station Bayatu, Balotara is pending against the petitioner.
6. Considering the nature of allegations and evidences collected by the prosecution, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Hence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/28