- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7611 WP No. 52142 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 52142 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MRS. C.ROSALINE DAUGHTER OF LATE CHINNAPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/A NO.184, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIVEKNAGARA FURTHER EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560 047. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. MARIA JOSEPH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SYED KHAMRUDDIN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU, NORTH SUB-DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 3. SENIOR SUB-REGISTRAR SHIVAJINAGAR, NO.122/2, MONARCH CHAMBERS, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA; Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7611 WP No. 52142 of 2019 SRI.R.GOPALA KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT AS R4 IN I.A.01/2020) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Maria Joseph., counsel on behalf of Sri.Syed Khamruddin., for the petitioner and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of impleading applicant as respondent No.4, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 19.02.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of impleading applicant as respondent No.4. Hence, for appearance of counsel for impleading applicant as respondent No.4, it was ordered to be listed on 20.02.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of impleading applicant as respondent No.4. This Court deems it proper to pass an appropriate order. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7611 WP No. 52142 of 2019 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 27.08.2019 vide Annexure-A. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 27.08.2019 vide Annexure-A. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 27.08.2019 vide Annexure-A in accordance with the law, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7611 WP No. 52142 of 2019 Because of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9