Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32486 (RAJ)

SANWAR LAL S/O SHRI GULAB CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13637/2024 · 2025-01-28

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13637/2024 Sanwar Lal S/o Shri Gulab Chand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mali Mohalla Rajagarh, Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/01/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.142/2024, registered with the Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 143, 302 & 201 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. As per the FSL report, the blood groups A, AB, B etc. have been detected from the articles seized during investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused have not sustained any injury and the prosecution could not disclose how blood of various groups have been detected from various articles seized during investigation. 5. Counsel for the petitioner has also raised an issue that the present case is based on circumstantial evidence and out of total 22 witnesses only one witness has been examined so far and the custody of the petitioner is more than eight months. [2025:RJ-JP:3987] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13637/2024] 6. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the case diary as well as the FSL report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and more particularly the fact that the present case is based on circumstantial evidence so also the fact that out of total 22 witnesses only one has been examined so far and the petitioner has already remained in custody for more than eight months, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Satyendra/464