Reema Devi Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Ex. Petition No.2159 of 2025 07.11.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents- State. While placing on record copy of office order dated 06.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, who is otherwise present in Court, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid office order, which is taken on record, Mr. Karan Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner, vehemently argued that consideration order is not in conformity with the judgment, sought to be executed. Having perused aforesaid office order vis-a-vis directions contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, this Court is not persuaded to agree with Mr. Karan Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner. Since there was only direction to consider the case of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 30.07.2025 passed by this court in CWP No.10589 of 2025, titled as Archana Sharma Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of afore judgment, have not found the same to be similar to Archana Sharma, no action of the respondents can be said to be continuacious. Needless to say, correctness of consideration order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, sought to be executed, cannot be ascertained in the instant proceedings, rather for that purpose, petitioner is required to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, sought to be executed. November 07, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge