2025:JHHC:36283 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 573 of 2025 --------------- 1. Navin Tanty, aged about 59 years, son of Bhim Tanty, resident of village-Unchibita, Post Unchibita, Police Station Toklo, Chakradharpur, District-West Sighbhum; 2. Mangata Hembrom, aged about 46 years, son of Saluka Hembrom, resident of village Darkada, Post Jharjhara, Police Station Toklo, Chakradharpur, District West Sighbhum; 3. Lakhindra Soy, aged about 62 years, son of Daya Shankar, resident of village Bandijahir, Post Jharjhans, Police Station Toklo, District West Sighbhum; 4. Viswamitra Tanty, aged about 59 years, son of Karu Tanty, resident of village Bharniya, Nawadih, Post Toklo, Police Station Toklo, District West Sighbhum; 5. Buka Mahto, aged about 59 years, son of Govind Chandra Mahato, resident of village Gunja, Post Toklo, Police Station Toklo, Chakradharpur, District West Sighbhum; 6. Dhan Singh Munda, aged about 54 years, son of Bushan Singh Munda, resident of village Kenke, Tola Moradih, Post Reladih, Police Station Toklo, Chakradharpur, District West Sighbhum; 7. Kupitan Hasda, aged about 50 years, son of Kushau Hasda, resident of village Hadur, Post Toklo, Police Station Toklo, Chakradharpur, District West Sighbhum ........Petitioners Versus 1. Mr. Kuldeep Chaudhary, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa officiating from Chaibasa, Post Chaibasa, Police Station Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum; 2. The State of Jharkhand ...... Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioner : None For the OP-State : Mr. Anish Kumar Mishra, AC to Sr. SC-I Order No.03/Dated: 3rd December, 2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed alleging wilfully and deliberately violation of the order of this Court dated 12.12.2023 passed in W.P(S) No.4763 of 2023 whereby and whereunder a direction has been issued to the concerned respondents (opposite parties herein) to give the financial benefit to the writ petitioners in pursuance to the order dated 18.11.2023 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 2025:JHHC:36283 2 2. When the matter is called out, no one appears to represent the petitioners. 3. A show cause dated 17.06.2025 has been filed on behalf of the contemnor-State. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the contemnor-State by referring to paragraph no.6 of the said show cause has submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court the financial benefit has already been paid to the petitioners, for ready reference the statement made thereof is being quoted hereunder as: “6. That it is humbly stated and submitted that Drawing and Disbursing Officer-cum-Circle Officer, Chakradharpur has paid the beneficiaries their due amount via NEFT and the payment process has been completed. The same has been reported by the Drawing and Disbursing Officer-cum-Circle Officer, Chakradharpur vide letter no.1102 dated 06.06.2025.” 5. After going through the statement made in paragraph no.6 of the show cause, this Court is of the view that the order of this Court dated 12.12.2023 passed in W.P(S) No.4763 of 2023 has already been complied with and, as such, there is no necessity to proceed further with this contempt petition. 6. In view of the above, the present contempt case is closed and, accordingly, disposed of as such. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Dated:03.12.2025 Sudhir