Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32482 (KAR)

G. T. RAMASWAMY v. SRI. M. N. MAHESH

CRL.A/1864/2023 · 2025-02-12

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1864 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. 1(A) G.T. RAMASWAMY SINCE DIED BY HIS LRs SMT. SUSHEELA W/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24TH CROSS 28TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102 1(B). MRS. PRATHIBHA R W/O LATE DINESH KUMAR L.V D/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24TH CROSS 28TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102 1(C). MR. PRATHAP G.R S/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24TH CROSS 28TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE -[ABSENT] Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023 AND: SRI. M. N. MAHESH S/O M.V. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 52 YARS R/AT BELAGODU VILLAGE AND HOBLI SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 127 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2019 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN IN CRL.A.NO.179/2018 CONSEQUENTLY UPHOLD THE CONVICTION ORDER PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., BELUR IN C.C.NO.332/2013 AND BE PLEASED TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE DOUBLE OF THE CHEQUE AMOUNT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. There is no representation on the appellants’ side. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fourth time. Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied. It appears that the appellants are not interested in - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023 prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12