APHC010479672024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 24632/2024 Between: 1. M/S Y.STRADERS, MGLM UNIT AUTO NAGAR,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, DEVARAPALLI ANANDKUMAR, S/O D. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC.PROPRIETOR, R/O D.NO.26-17-49, 1ST FLOOR. NEAR AUTO NAGAR GATE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN-520003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. LEATHER INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF A P LTD, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT MAHENDRA ENCLAVE, NRI BLOCK-C, 3RD FLOOR,FLAT NO.8, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR-522501. 3. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, LIDCAP LTD R/O MAHENDRA ENCLAVE, NRI BLOCK-C, 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO.8,TADEPALLI, GUNTUR, AP- 522501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of SRS,J W.P.No.24632 of 2024 the respondent authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioner highhandedly without issuing notice, from land situated in R.S No. 173 - plot no.1 - lALA layout, Jawahar auto Nagar, Vijayawada, without following the due process of law, as illegal arbitrary and violative of Art 14,15,16,19,21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner, except in accordance with law as mandated by the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of RAME GOWDA V/S M VARADAPPA NAIDU Citation 2003 LawSuit(SC) 1248 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner from land situated in R.S No. 173 - plot no.1 - lALA layout, Jawahar auto Nagar, Vijayawadawithout following due process of law and pass order or orders in accordance with law pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 29.10.2024 which was subsequently extended on 12.11.2024 passed in W.P.No.24632 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition with exemplary costs in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above writ petition has been filed to declare the action of the respondent authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioner from Plot No.1 of SRS,J W.P.No.24632 of 2024 IALA Layout, Jawahar Auto Nagar, Vijayawada, without issuing any notice, illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Sri B. Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Teja, learned Special Government Pleader, attached to the office of Advocate General, appeared for the respondents 2 & 3. 3. An interim order was granted on 29.10.2024, directing the respondent authorities to maintain the status quo, subject to payment of monthly rent of Rs.75,000/- from that day onwards. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that pending the writ petition, the petitioner filed suit in O.S.No.97 of 2025 on the file of the learned VIII Addl. District Judge, Vijayawada against respondent No.2. Learned counsel would also submit that since the petitioner filed suit in OS.No.97 of 2025, the petitioner will prosecute the suit, instead of the writ petition. The petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 5. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further adjudication is required in the writ petition. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 09.07.2025 TVN SRS,J W.P.No.24632 of 2024 357 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.24632 OF 2024 Date : 09.07.2025 TVN