Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32477 (PAT)

Raushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./22046/2025 · 2025-04-21

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22046 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- SRIPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Raushan Kumar S/O Chandeshwar Rai R/O Village- Jhounvan Dhala, P.S.- Awatarnagar, District- Saran 2. Rajnish Kumar Thakur @ Rajnish Kumar S/O Mukesh Thakur Village- Gangajal Tola, PS- Sonepur, District- Saran 3. Raju Kumar S/O Asarfi Ray R/O village- Sabalpur Pachhiyari Tola, PS- Sonepur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sripur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 dated 02.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 317(5) of B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 215.100 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Tata Gold vehicle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22046 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have no criminal antecedent and the petitioner no.3 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 03.02.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above- named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Sripur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T