Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101
COCP-1422-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.07.2025
KELA DEVI
.... Petitioner VERSUS RAKESH SAINI AND ANR
.... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Ms. Anika Khurb, DDA, Administrator, Gurugram, HSVP Office, states that the petitioner has since applied for a plot in the Oustee quota and till such time as the application for allotment of the plot under the Oustee quota is not decided, no demolition would be carried out.
2.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the present contempt petition at this stage.
3.
Dismissed as not pressed at this stage. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
03.07.2025
(ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain
JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.07.04 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment