NEPALI YADAV ALIAS ANUJ YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7186/2025 · 2025-12-17
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32470 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32470 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37946
--1-- A.B.A. No. 7186 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 7186 of 2025
---- Nepali Yadav @ Anuj Yadav, aged about 36 years, S/o Ram Swaroop Yadav @ Ramswarup Yadav, R/o Sector-9 Khatal, PO -Sector 9, PS – Harla, Bokaro Steel City, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Lily Sahay, Advocate
---- 02/17.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the
learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sector-IV P.S. Case No.30 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 75, 352, 351(3), 126(2), 303(2) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Ranchi.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the FIR itself the informant has admitted that there is prior dispute between the parties and in view of that concocted story has been made against the petitioner. He further submits that the allegation of causing grievous injury with an iron rod is specifically attributed to co-accused Dipu Yadav and not the present petitioner. He then submits that the allegation is made that an old asbestos sheet was used by which unlikely to cause any grievous or life-threatening injury. He next submits that there is no medical evidence on record of grievous injury. He also submits that the
2025:JHHC:37946
--2-- A.B.A. No. 7186 of 2025
petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of assault.
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that the allegation is there against co-accused Pankaj Yadav and Dipu Yadav of assault and outraging her modesty and there is no medical report on record of injury and the alleged occurrence is said to be dated 14th March, 2025 and the FIR has been lodged on 15.03.2025 in the evening and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Ranchi in connection with Sector-IV P.S. Case No.30 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.12.2025 Sangam/