Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32469 (RAJ)

NEPAL LAL S/O SHYAMLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13664/2024 · 2025-03-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11885] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13664/2024 Nepal Lal S/o Shyamlal, R/o Banjaro Ka Kheda Aakya Ka Kheda, Aakya Gahlot, Police Station Gandhar District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Dutt Rundla, Adv., for Mr. O.P. Jhajhria, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/03/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.170/2024 registered at Police Station Gangdhar, District Jhalawar for the offences punishable under Sections 6 & 8(i) of the Rajasthan Fisheries Act, 1953 and Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that in terms of order dated 06.11.2024, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. He argues that other co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He contends that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He places the factual report dated [2025:RJ-JP:11885] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13664/2024] 19.11.2024 on record, according to which, petitioner has joined the investigation and co-operating in the investigation. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and especially the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Gangdhar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) in FIR No.170/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Nepal Lal S/o Shyamlal, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/247