Cherukuri Siddaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/25685/2025 · 2025-09-18
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010479572025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 25685 of 2025 Between:
1. CHERUKURI SIDDAIAH,, S/O. PEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC . GOVERNMENT SERVICE
(ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ASSISTANT IN GRAM SACHIVALAYAM) R/O.
THOTTIGARIPALLI VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL REVENUE DIVISION, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
4. THE THASILDAR, BRAMHAMGARI MATTAM MANDAL,. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
5. SMT KALUVAYEE JAYAMMA, ,W/O. SUBBAREDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC . HOUSEWIFE,
R/O.
BOVILLAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
6. SMT NARI AMMANAMMA, , W/O. POTHULURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC . HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO . 39 / 25 - 38, BYPASS ROAD, NEAR SUBBIREDDY COLLEGE, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
7. PANGA MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O. PULLAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC .CULTIVATION,
R/O. NAGISETTIPALLE VILLAGE, BRAMHAMGARI MATTAM MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
2
8. SANGANA KISHORE REDDY, S/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, R/O. NALLABASAYAPALLE VILLAGE, DUVVUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
9. DABBUGUNTLA RAMANAIAH, S/O. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION,
R/O. G.
NARASIMHAPURAM VILLAGE, CHOUDARIVARIPALLE POST BRAMHAMGARI MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
10. DUMPALA KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O. RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO .39 / 539 - 3, RAMALAYA STREET, ARAVINDANAGAR, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue the Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the 3rd Respondent to enter the Petitioner's name in the Revenue Records pertaining to an extent of Ac.3.05 cents in Survey No. 133/3 situated at Nagisettipalle Village, Bramhamgari Mattam, YSR Kadapa District in the place of Sri. Bacchu Venkata Subba Rao based on the Appeal Case No. E / 80 / 2022 of the Petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue the Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the 3rd Respondent to enter the Petitioner’s name in the Revenue Records pertaining to an extent of Ac.3.05 cents in Survey No.133/3 situated at Nagisettipalle Village, Bramhamgari Mattam, YSR Kadapa District in the place of Sri Bacchu Venkata Subba Rao based on the Appeal Case No.E/80/2022 of the Petitioner and pass such other order or orders…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal registered as Appeal Case No.E/80/2022 dated 02.06.2022 pending before the 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously.
5. Ergo, this Court is inclined to direct the 3rd respondent-appellate authority to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the appeal on merits and as per law, after hearing all the
4
parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible, and, in any case, not beyond three (03) months from date of receipt of a copy this order.
6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.09.2025
siva
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25685 of 2025
Date: 19.09.2025
siva