Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32463 (AP)

MEDAPATI SUDHAKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7662/2024 · 2025-01-07

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

. ` lN THE HIGH COURT 9F ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT.- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY-r i''-`j CRIMINAL PETITION NO.- 7662 OF 2024 -a..;i? ;utJj-, E= Between.I 1. Medapatjsudhakar Reddy, s/o. srjnl'vasa Reddy, aged 40 years, R/o. H. No. 39-15-12/4, Near BSNL Office, opposite MotheVarI'Shopl'ng complex, western street, Eluru, EIuru Rural, Eluru DI'Strl-Ct, Andhra Pradesh. 2. AIIadaLavanya, w/o. Gopl®, aged 39 years, R/o. H. No. 4-93/22, Flat No. 502, ChalsanI® Resl'dency, Telecom Nagar, 1st Road, Near VI'dyaVjkas college, satrampadu, Eluru Rural, EIuru DI'StrI'Ct, Andhra pradesh. 3. GudavallM'dyasagar, s/o. Anand Kumar, aged 45 years, R/o. 28- 1- 53/1, Santhj Nagar, 8th Lane, Eluru (Rural), lndustrI'al Estate, EIuru DistrI-Ct, Andhra pradesh. 4. Veeramalla Rajesh, s/o. Gangadharam, aged 32 years, R/o. H. No.10- 177/2, Bapanamma Temple Street, Anaparthj, East Godavarj DI®StrjCt, Andhra pradesh. AND Petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 ©xerT<gived¢® The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High l Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. SHO PS, EIuru Ill Town, Eluru District Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to grant pre arrest bail to the petitioners in the event of their arrest in crime No. 297 of 2024 on the file of the SHO PS, EIuru Ill Town, Eluru District dated 06.10.2024 The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dt.28.10.2024, 29.ll.2024,13.12.2024 & 19.12.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI V SAI KUMAR Advocate for the Petitioners, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following The Court made the following Order: 1. The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the Petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.297 of 2024 of EIuru Ill Town Police Station. OEIE \ rim 2 2. A case has been registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 318(4), 308(2), 308(5), 351(2), 74,111 (2) read with 3(5) of B.N.S.. 3. Case of the prosecution js that, on 06.10.2024, the de-facto complainant lodged a report stating that he borrowed money as a loan for faml-ly necessities from accused No. 1 on 16.03.2023. Despite repaying more than the borrowed amount after six months, the accused continued to demand additional payments. Accused forcibly obtained his signatures on empty cheques, promissory notes, and white papers. Furthermore, the accused, With the assistance of A2, A3, and A4, forcibly took away household items, including a Television, Refrigerator and his wife'S gold ear studs. The de-facto complainant also alleged that the accused threatened to file a complaint in the court if, they failed to repay the amounts, 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5, A perusal of the record goes to show that there are Certain civil litigations pending between the defacto complainant and the accused. The alleged offences said to have been taken Place in the year 2023. Therefore, in order to settle civil litigation that has been pending, this case appears to have been registered at a belated stage on o6.10.2024. After lapse of a year, the Present complaint has been filed, as against the petitioners herein. It appears that there is no explanation with regard to the delay caused. c€froLi- 3 6. ln view of th-e,,said reasons, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitI'OnerS/accused Nos.1 to 4. 7. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest, petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each, with two, sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioners shall make themselves available for l'nvestigation as and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the station House Officer, Eluru lll Town Poilce Station, once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet. Accordingly, the Criml-naI Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// sD/- B.PRASAD RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1 sECTIOGri&ohaEfr~ For A To, 1. The Station House officer, Eluru Ill Town Pol'lce Station, EIuru District (by RPAD) 2. One CC to SRI. V SAI KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two cos to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P[OUT] 4. One spare copy I, HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED..07/01 /2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.7662 of 2024 ALLOWED