Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32463 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3653/2025 · 2025-05-05

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72283 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3653 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avaneesh Kumar Upadhyay,Virat Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Suresh Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Shri Vimlesh Rai, learned counsel for the respondent Corporation submits that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of assailing the impugned order imposing penalty by filing a revision before the competent authority under the relevant service rules. Faced with this learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a recovery is being made from the salary of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: i. The petitioner shall file a revision along with the stay application before the revising authority. ii. The revising authority shall decide the stay application within a period of 15 days and the revision shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of submission of a copy of this order along with the stay applicant and memo of revision. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad