Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10830 WP No. 24543 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24543 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI K SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE KARRUPANNA GOUNDER
2.
SRI K S DINESH JAYAN S/O K SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
BOTH 1 AND 2 R/A NO.681, 10TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, BTM 2ND STAGE, MICO LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR G S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHAIRMAN THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS TRIBUNAL AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU- 560 009.
2.
SMT S SARASWATHI W/O SRI K SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.681, 10TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, BTM 2ND STAGE MICO LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 076.
CURRENTLY RESIDING AT HER
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10830 WP No. 24543 of 2024
DAUGHTER'S HOUSE NO.422, 2ND FLOOR BLOCK NO.5, BTM 2ND STAGE, MICO LAYOUT, BEHIND INDIAN BANK, 8TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 076.
3.
THE MANAGER BANK OF INDIA H S R LAYOUT BRANCH BENGALURU-560 102.
4.
M/S BRIGHT PATH TECHNOLOGY @ SERVICE PVT. LTD., CORPORATE UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2003.
NO.233, 2ND FLOOR, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, MADIVALA, BENGALURU - 560 068.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
5.
SMT K S SRIDEVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS W/O K RAVIKUMAR D/O SRI SUBRAMANI AND SMT SARASWATHI
R/AT NO.422, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK NO.5, BTM 2ND STAGE MICO LAYOUT, BEHIND INDIAN BANK, 8TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DTD 11.07.2024 IN MSC 04/2024 PASSED BY THE R-1 AT ANNX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10830 WP No. 24543 of 2024
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. There is no interim order granted.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
bk/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 344