RAM CHANDRA BELDER (NONIA) v. STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/7088/2025 · 2025-12-11
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32459 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32459 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37189
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.7088 of 2025 ----
1. Ram Chandra Belder (Nonia) aged about 75 years son of Late Gurusahay Beldar
2. Loknath Nonia aged about 52 years son of Ram Chandra Nonia both resident of Bastakola, P.O.-Dhansar, P.S.-Jharia, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
…. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, having his office at Project Building, P.O & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O., PS. & District-Dhanbad.
3. The Circle Officer, Jharia, PO.PS. Jharia and District-Dhanbad.
…. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Kumar Pawan, A.C. to S.C. Mines-III
Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Adv.
Ms. Diksha Rani, Adv.
Ms. Priya Saw, Adv.
----
06/Dated: 11th December, 2025
1. The present writ petition has been for writ/order/direction upon the respondents for providing encroachment free Government settled land provided to the petitioner under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Act, 1956 in consideration to the Letter No.277 Dated 20.03.2021 of the respondent.
2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the civil remedy is not available to the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner is remediless and the Writ Court has to decide civil suit after taking all evidence. This is an issue of great public importance and it will change the nature of the writ jurisdiction.
2025:JHHC:37189
Page | 2
W.P. (C) No.7088 of 2025
3. As per the pleading, it appears that there is affected private person but they have not been made party. Thus, the writ has been filed without necessary party.
4. Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, learned counsel has filed intervenor petition claiming that his right has been affected.
5. Since the writ petition has been filed without impleading the necessary/affected party, this Court finds the present writ not maintainable. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 11th December, 2025 Amar/- Uploaded on 12.12.2025