MRS. BASANTHI RANI PAUL v. MR NINGANA GOWDA HOSAMANI
MFA/4643/2018 · 2025-03-03
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32455 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32455 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8951 MFA No. 4643 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4643 OF 2018 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
MRS. BASANTHI RANI PAUL, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O MR. R.N.PAUL, R/AT NO. 76, 2ND CROSS, DINNUR AJJAPPA BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALURU NORTH, BANGALORE - 560 032. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHANDRAIAH H. S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR. NINGANA GOWDA HOSAMANI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O ADIVEPPA GOWDA HOSAMANI, NO.50, 1ST STAGE, POSTAL COLONY, SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 050.
2.
MR. P.C.CHOWDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE P CHANDRASEKESHAVAPPA, NO.106, 4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, 2ND PHASE, MANJUNATHANAGAR,
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8951 MFA No. 4643 of 2018
WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 010.
3.
MR. C V. SRINATH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O OF MR. V.N.CHOWDAPPA, NO.148, 9TH MAIN ROAD, KURUBARAHALLI, NEAR CANARA SCHOOL, J.C.NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM POST, BENGALURU - 560 086.
4.
MRS. ZEENATHUNISA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O OF MR. RAFIQUE AHMED, NO. 227, 14TH MAIN ROAD, GOKUL 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, HMT LAYOUT, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 560 054. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. UDITA RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR CR/R1)
THIS MFA FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 31.05.2018, PASSED ON IA.1 IN O.S. NO.406/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-15), BENGALURU, REJECTING THE IA.1, FILED U/O.39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8951 MFA No. 4643 of 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant filed a memo stating that the suit came to be decreed on 01.04.2023. Hence, the appeal has become infructuous.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.1/2018 does not survive for consideration and it is
disposed of.
SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21