M/S MAYA HOTELS PVT LTD v. THE RECOVERY OFFICER -II
WA/1094/2022 · 2025-02-24
Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32453 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32453 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8073-DB WA No. 1094 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO. 1094 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. MAYA HOTELS PVT LTD No.52/1, CHURCH STREET BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR MRS. THIRTHA KUMARASWAMY …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. VENKATESHWARAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE RECOVERY OFFICER-II DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL JEEVAN BHIMA BUILDING RESIDENCY ROAD BENGALURU-560 025
2. SUB-REGISTRAR GOVT. OF KARNATAKA SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 002
3.
MR. RAJNESHWAR DAYAL CHIEF MANAGER CORPORATION BANK No.24, K.H. ROAD BENGALURU-560 027
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8073-DB WA No. 1094 of 2022
4.
AUTHORIZED OFFICER CORPORATION BANK SHANTHINAGAR BRANCH No.24, K.H. ROAD BENGALURU-560 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANUPAMA HEGDE, CGC FOR R1;
SRI. C.H. DEVARAJA, GA FOR R2;
SRI. K.B. MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO REVISE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 20.10.2022 IN LINE WITH THE PRAYER SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT PASSED IN WP No.38524/2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT IN THE INTEREST OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND THE SAID WRIT PETITION MAY BE ORDERED TO BE ALLOWED AS PRAYED FOR THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8073-DB WA No. 1094 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL )
Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
2. The memo reads as under:-
"The appellant respectfully that, would like to withdraw the above writ appeal with liberty to file fresh writ appeal in the near future".
3. The memo is placed on record.
4. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23