Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No. 115 Court No. 35 G.S.Das
10.03.2025
WPA 15956 of 2023
Avijit Gope -Vs- The Officer-in-Charge, Lake Police Station & Ors.
Mr. Siddhartha Ghosh
… for the State-respondent(s)
None appears either for the petitioner or for the State.
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the investigation being carried out by the Lake police station.
The grievance of the petitioner relates to a representation made to the police authorities in the year
2023. However, no information has been furnished before this Court in respect of the outcome of the investigation.
Having considered that, substantial time have passed in the meantime, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach
the concerned police authorities if the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has not been filed, and/or ventilate his grievance in the appropriate forum if the same is not barred by limitation.
Since none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Siddhartha Ghosh, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. His appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities.
With the aforesaid observations, WPA 15956 of 2023 is disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, is also
disposed of.
Parties to act on a server copy of this
order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)