SHYAM RAJ GAUD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/8511/2025 · 2025-03-23
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42430 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8511 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyam Raj Gaud And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav,Ravindra Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent no. 2/ Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur to decide the mutation case no. 05023 of 2018, Computerized Case No. T201814360105023 (Jaunga Vs. Hari Lal) filed under section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in some specified period fixed by this hon'ble court. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent no. 2 i.e. Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Shahganj District Jaunpur (Respondent no. 2 ) to mutate the name of the petitioners the revenue record i.e. Khatauni on the basis of registered sale deed dated 14.8.2003 executed by respondent no. 3 regard to the Land Arazi Nos. 128 area 66 Dismil, 216 area 5 dismil and 324 area 86 dismil situated in village Dandsauli (chakvishunpur), Pargana - Anguli, Tehsil - Shahganj, District - Jaunpur, in pursuance of mutation case no. 05023 of 2018,Computerized Case No. T201814360105023 filed under section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Jauga Vs. Hari Lal) in some specified period fixed by this hon'ble court."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that mutation proceedings are pending since 2018 and he prayed that same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Shahganj District Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad