SMT. NEETU DAGAR W/O SHRI VINOD CHOUDHARY v. DIRECTOR
CW/16891/2024 · 2025-01-13
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32437 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32437 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16891/2024
1. Smt. Neetu Dagar W/o Shri Vinod Choudhary aged about 23 years R/o Dhandhali, Tehsil Surot, District Karoli
2. Smt. Kusum Kumari W/o Shri Dharmendra Kumar Jat, aged about 30 years R/o Dhandhali, Tehsil Surot District Karoli
3. Smt. Angoori Mali, W/o Shri Devi Singh Mali, aged about years 36 years R/o Tehsil Surot, District Karoli
4. Ruksana Bano W/o Rehmad Khan, aged about 34 years R/o 93, Near Petrol PUmp, Kanchroli, Tehsil Mahaveerji, District Karoli
5. Smt. Krishna Devi W/o Shrikaptan Singh, aged about 35 years, R/o Dhursi, Tehsil Surot, District Karoli
6. Smt. Karishma Sharma, W/o Satyendra Sharma aged about 32 years, R/o Agraseen Colony in front of meel, Kheidamard, Hindaun City, District Karoli
7. Laxmi Puri, W/o DEshraj Goswami aged about 29 years, R/o Kaachroli, Hindaun, District Karoli ----Petitioners Versus
1. Director, Department of Women and Child Development 2 Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur
2. Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development, Karoli, Rajasthan
3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad Karauli, Rajasthan
4. Project Officer, Child Development Project Hindaun. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hardev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 13/01/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in spite of serving a legal notice dated 17.10.2024 raising grievance of the petitioner, the respondents have not be considered the same as per the ratio of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan.
(2 of 2) [CW-16891/2024] Issue notices. On directions of the Court, Ms. Pooja Sharma accepts appearing on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma AAG accepts notices for the respondents. Considering the consensus drawn inter-se between the parties, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present the petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation/legal notice for demand of justice within an upper limit of thirty days from the date of passing of this order as per the directions spelled out in the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan. It is made clear that non-compliance of the aforementioned directions shall result in imposition of cost upon the concerned officer. In light of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /29