1 2025:CGHC:48834 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6204 of 2023 1 - Tikesh Kumar Tarak S/o Sukhiram Tarak Aged About 37 Years Teacher (English) Government Middle School Gudbheli Block Mainpur District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Ps And Po Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division Raipur Integrated Education Premises, 1st Floor Pension Bada Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 4 - District Eduction Officer Gariyaband District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Zainab Mustafa Vanak, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to consider the change of posting place of the petitioner at Government Middle School Diwana, or any nearby school in Chhura Block, as per the guideline/direction Dated 29.03.2023 issued Under Secretary, School Education Department. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to grant any other relief which this Hori'ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner as per the facts & circumstance of the present 3 case, in the ends of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to file a fresh representation and the said representation may be directed to be decided within stipulated time. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel do not opposes the said submission. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the said submissions, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a fresh representation before the authority concerned along with the relevant documents within a period of two weeks from the date of copy of this order and in turn, the authorities are directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of the said representations. 6. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat