Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32433 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD HASAM S/O SUBHAN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13609/2024 · 2025-01-07

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:828] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 13609/2024 Mohammad Hasam S/o Subhan Khan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sabalgarh, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 367/2023 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg for offence u/S 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC. 2. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.07.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2024 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery and the trial will take its own time, therefore the accused petitioner may be released on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:828] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13609/2024] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and so also the fact that no other criminal case pending against the accused petitioner and he is in custody since 07.10.2024, this Court deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that such type of accused persons of particular areas, who are found to be involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, celebrate their release in public, hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is stipulated that the accused-petitioner shall not celebrate his release in public, and if he is found to be involved in celebrating his release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /25