AJAY SHARMA v. EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
CWP/30183/2025 · 2026-01-13
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CWP-30183-2025 Date of Decision : January 13, 2026 AJAY SHARMA -PETITIONER V/S EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ORS. -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Samir Rathaur, Advocate for the respondent No.1. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner since the initial listing of the present writ petition. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
2. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) January 13, 2026
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.01.13 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment