Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32429 (KAR)

S RAVI KUMAR v. M/S GANGOTHTRI VENTURES

WP/51136/2019 · 2025-02-06

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5459 WP No. 51136 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51136 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: S.RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE K.SRINIVASA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A NO.20, BSK 3RD STAGE, ITTMADU MAIN ROAD, SRIRAMANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SOWMYA SRIDHAR & SMT. NETHRA.G., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. M/S. GANGOTHTRI VENTURES HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.112/A, "SHABARIKRUPA" 5TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, SRINIVASANAGAR, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 050. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS. T.A.MUNISWAMY NAIDU AND N.R.RAJU. 2. T.A.MUNISWAMY NAIDU S/O LATE T.ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO.112/A "SHABARIKRUPA", 5TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, SRINIVASANAGAR, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 050. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5459 WP No. 51136 of 2019 3. N.SUDHAKAR S/O Y.NARASIMHASETTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A "GAYATHRI KUTEERA", NEAR VASAVI SCHOOL, BANGALORE ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577 522. 4. A.SANTOSH S/O G.S.ADANANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/S BRAMHADEVA ENTERPRISES, OPP.POST OFFICE, KUNIGAL-672 130. 5. N.R.RAJU S/O N.S.RAMANAIAHSETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A "NEELADRINILAYA", 2ND CROSS, VASAVI COLONY, BANGALORE ROAD, CHALLARKERE-577 522. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VAIDYA RAVI LAXMINARAYANA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5459 WP No. 51136 of 2019 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 14.02.2023, on that day, though the matter called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed next week. The petition is listed today. The petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's pending for almost six years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33