APHC010478482013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28539 OF 2013 Between: G.S.R.Textiles Private Limited, Regd. Office L 3-28-48, 6th Lane, Brundavan Gardens, Guntur, Rep. by its Managing Director, G.Srinviasa Rao ...PETITIONER AND Southern Power Distribution Company of A P Limited, (APSPDCL), rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Tirupati, Chittoor District. The Superintending Engineer, Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APSPDCL), Circle Office, Brodipet, Guntur. The Chief General Manager, Finance Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APSPDCL), Tirupati, Chittoor District. A.P.Electricity Regulatory Commission Rep Secretary, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in issuing Memo No. C GM(Fin)/GM/(Rev)/SA O/AAO/SA/HT/D.No.396/13, dated 10.09.2013, whereby a demand for payment of Rs.88,93,740/- towards Restriction & Control (R&C) charges has been raised, as illegal, without jurisdiction violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India consequently set-aside the same. [A NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP 35416 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the demand for payment of Rs.88,93,740/- towards Restriction & Control (R&C) charges from the petitioner vide Memo.. No. COM (Fin) /GM/(Rev)/SAO/AAO/S A/HT/ D.No.396/13, dated 10.09.2013, issued by the 1' respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. ^ Counsel for the Petitioner: P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3:SRI V. V. SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI The Court made the following order: anc anc APHC010478482013 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28539/2013 IN [3331] slM THE Between; 1 r; 9 R TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,, LANE, BRUNDAVAN GARDENS, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G.SRINVIASA RAO REGD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G.SRINVIASA RAO REGD. OFFICE L 3-28-48, 6TH ...PETITIONER AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR 1. SOUTHERN POWER (APSPDCL), REP. BY TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SOUTHERN POWER distribution COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED (APSPDCL), CIRCLE OFFICE, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. 3 THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED (APSPDCL) TIRUPATI, 2.THE finance southern power DISTRIBUTION CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4 A P ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REP SECRETARY, SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circultances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one ,n he nature 'of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent ' O/AAO/SA/HT/D.No.396/13, dated 10.09.2Ulc5, C GM(F in)/GM/(Rev)/SA • Comro7rR&ct R®-88.93,740/- towards Restriction LA NO: 1 OF 2ni.‘^(\A/P|vip 2541fi DF 9ni^ Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI 2.V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) & India and or orders as case. 3. The Court made the following: "ORDER:: Sri V.Krishna Kanth, learned learned counsel for the petition does not survive and hence, 2. Recording the above submission, infructuous. No order as to costs. counsel representing Sri P.Roy Reddy, cause in the writ the same is now rendered infructuous. petitioner would submit that the the Writ Petition is dismissed as rv' 3 f As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. Sd/- J. SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SEC To, 1. One CC to Sri P. Roy Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Putiuri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri V. V. Satish (SC for APEPDCL) [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER WP No. 28539 OF 2013 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS