GANESH SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/6883/2025 · 2025-12-06
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32410 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32410 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:36610
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.6883 of 2025 ---- Ganesh Saw, aged about 46 years, Son of Late Dipan Saw, Resident of Village – Bukru, P.O.-Dhangadda, P.S.-Tandwa, District – Chatra.
…. …. Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary of the State of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi.
2. The Secretary of Revenue, Land Reforms and Registration Department, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, Chatra Collectorate, P.O. + P.S. + District-Chatra.
4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Chatra Collectorate, P.O. + P.S. + District-Chatra.
5. The Deputy General Manager, IRCOM International Limited, 121/C, Mandir Marg, Ashok Nagar, P.O.+P.S.- Argora, District – Ranchi.
…. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Jayant Kr. Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. Abhijeet Anand, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I
----
02/Dated: 06th December, 2025
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:-
“For direction upon the respondents (Respondent No.4 in particularly) to pay the compensation amount on the acquired landed property of the petitioner pertaining to Mouza-Bukru, Khata No.30, Plot No.434 and on the said land a Stabestus Roof of Building a is standing at the rate of 510/- Per A Sq. feet as paid in the L.A. caseNo.11 of 2013-14 and case of the petitioner is similar. ii) For direction upon the respondents concerned to re-determine the compensation amount as two different rate has been fixed on the same purpose by the authority concerned.”
2025:JHHC:36610
Page | 2
W.P. (C) No.6883 of 2025
3. Parity has been sought with the gotia. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not clear that in both the law even in the Land Acquisition Act as well as in the Railway Act there is a provision for enhancement.
4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of giving liberty to the litigant to approach the appropriate authority by invoking appropriate law.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 06th December, 2025 Amar/- Uploaded on 10.12.2025