Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32405 (AP)

SYEED SHAMIM BHANU v. POTHINA SRINIVASA RAO

CRP/2579/2024 · 2025-07-17

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010478522024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2579/2024 Between: 1. SYEED SHAMIM BHANU, W/O. LATE. SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 37-2-1-15-19/A, 0PP. FLOUR MILL RICKSHAW BAZAAR, ONGOLE. 2. SYYED INTIAYAZ,, S/O. LATE. SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 37-2-1-15-19/A 0PP. FLOUR MILL RICKSHAW BAZAAR, ONGOLE. 3. SYYED IRSHAN,, S/O. LATE. SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 37-2-1-15-19/A, 0PP. FLOUR MILL RICKSHAW BAZAAR, ONGOLE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. POTHINA SRINIVASA RAO, , S/o. Anjaneyulu, Aged about 48 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Pothinavaripalem Village, Karamchedu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the continuation Execution Petition proceedings of E.P. No. 28 of 2019 in O.S. No. 199 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Parchur and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P. No. 28 of 2019 in O.S. No. 199 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Parchur, pending disposal of the CRP, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2579 of 2024 ORDER:- 1. The matter was listed on 27.06.2025, there was no representation. Again it was listed on 11.07.2025, there was no representation. Today also there is no representation. 2. In that view of the same, it is clear that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the present revision petition. 3. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.07.2025 DR 79 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.2579 of 2024 Date 18.07.2025 DR