Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32402 (KAR)

RANJEETH v. STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION

CRL.P/10231/2023 · 2025-01-27

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3543 CRL.P No. 10231 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10231 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. RANJEETH, S/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. JAYANTHI, W/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: HOUSEWIFE, 3. VENKATESH, S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. V. AKSHAY, S/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT: AMRUTHAVARSHINI NILAYA, DURGAMMA TEMPLE STREET, CHAYAMMA LAYOUT, VIDYANAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA - 560 038. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3543 CRL.P No. 10231 of 2023 STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SANGEETHA S., W/O RANJEETH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/A: AYANUR KOTE VILLAGE, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 560 038. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R1; SRI.M.V.MAHESHWARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1782/2023 REGISTERED BY WOMEN POLICE STATION, SHIVAMOGGA /1st RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.498-A, 504, 323, 506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT 1961 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC II COURT AT SHIVAMOGGA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant has moved a memo dated 21.01.2025, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. 2. The memo reads as under: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3543 CRL.P No. 10231 of 2023 "In view of the settlement held between the petitioners and respondent No.2, the above named petitioners seek permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present petition as not pressed. Accordingly this Hon'ble Court may kindly dismiss the present petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Memo is accepted. 4. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE RD