IQ CITY FOUNDATION AND ANR v. BANK OF BARODA AND ORS
WPA/17088/2021 · 2025-10-24
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32399 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32399 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
24.10.2025 4 sdas
WPA 17088 of 2021 with CAN 2 of 2022 with CAN 3 of 2022 with CAN 5 of 2022
IQ City Foundation & Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee Mr. Ramendu Agarwal ……. for the petitioners
Mr. Avishek Guha Ms. Shilpa Das ……. for the Bank of Baroda
Mr. Debdatta Sen, Sr. Adv. Ms. Suchismita Ghosh Chatterjee …….. for the RBI
Mr. Mukherjee, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that with the passage of time the writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly the petitioners do not want to proceed with this writ petition. Written instruction as submitted on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2 In view of dismissal of the writ petition, connected applications are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)