Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32395 (RAJ)

SADDAM S/O KAMALDEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13510/2024 · 2025-01-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1450] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13510/2024 1. Saddam S/o Kamaldeen, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Paldi, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Akram S/o Mubin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Paldi, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13613/2024 1. Furkan S/o Abdul Rashid, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vaas Nandera, Ps Kama, Distt. Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Distt. Jail, Deeg). 2. Mohammed Kaif S/o Jom Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Vaas Nandera, Ps Kama, Distt. Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Distt. Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14026/2024 Aasim S/o Kamaal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Akata, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14027/2024 Mubeen S/o Sodan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Dudaval, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). [2025:RJ-JP:1450] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13510/2024] ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh with Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.594/2024 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66(D) & 67(A) of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matters are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:1450] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13510/2024] 5. Considering the fact that the matters are exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Saddam S/o Kamaldeen, 2. Akram S/o Mubin, 3. Furkan S/o Abdul Rashid, 4. Mohammed Kaif S/o Jom Khan, 5. Aasim S/o Kamaal & 6. Mubeen S/o Sodan in connection with FIR No.594/2024 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/19-22