Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32394 (KAR)

SMT. B. SHWETHA v. STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE

CRL.P/8520/2017 · 2025-06-02

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18509 CRL.P No. 8520 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8520 OF 2017 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. B. SHWETHA D/O C BALACHANDRA, W/O RAVI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 23, SAPTHAGIRI NILAYA, KRISHNA TEMPLE, DODDABOMMASANDRA ARCH, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 560 097 AND ALSO R/AT NO.54, N BLOCK, KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU - 575 001. 2. SHRUTHI B, D/O C. BALACHANDRA, W/O RAMADEV, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, PRESENTLY AT # 303, 29TH MAIN ROAD, POORNA PRAJNA LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 061. AND ALSO R/AT NO.1603, 2ND MAIN, ARAVINDANAGARA, KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU - 575 007. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.N. BHAT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. B.R. RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18509 CRL.P No. 8520 of 2017 AND: 1. STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE, MYSURU, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. N.M. VEERENDRANATH, S/O MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 3. SMT. SAVITHA G. LAKOLLA, W/O N.M. VEERENDRANATH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT # 1244, 1ST FLOOR, 8TH A MAIN, VIJAYANAGARA, 1ST STAGE, MYSURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VENKAT SATYANARAYAN A, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1388/2016 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 447, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC WHCIH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18509 CRL.P No. 8520 of 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already the matter pending before the Trial Court is disposed of. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 CT: BHK