Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32387 (CAL)

FERDOUSI BEGUM v. SK ABDUL KALAM PRADAHAN KUMIRMORAH GRAM PANCHAYAT

CPAN/1231/2025 · 2025-09-11

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

04 11.09.2025 kaushik C.P.A.N. 1231 of 2025 in WPA 27692 of 2024 Sunil Saren @ Sunil Hembram Vs. Mr. Jayanta Patra Mr. Sk. Abu Abbasuddin … for the applicant. Ms. Suvasree Ghose … for the alleged contemnor. This is an application alleging violation of an order dated 2nd December, 2024 read with subsequent order dated 25th April, 2025. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that notwithstanding a direction on the respondent authorities and more particularly the Pradhan being the respondent no. 8 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 13th September, 2024, there has been no compliance with the above direction. Despite service, the alleged contemnor remains unrepresented. Ms. Suvasree Ghose, Advocate, who usually 2 appears on behalf of State is present in Court and is directed to represent the alleged contemnor. The appointment of Ms. Ghose be regularized by the Legal Remembrancer. A copy of the application for contempt is served on Ms. Ghose. Ms. Ghose assures this Court that appropriate communication would be made with the respondent no. 8 i.e., the alleged contemnor to ensure compliance with the order dated 2nd December, 2024 read with subsequent order dated 25th April, 2025 positively within four weeks from the date of communication of this order. In view of the above submissions, the instant application being CPAN 1231 of 2025 in WPA 27692 of 2024 stands disposed of with a direction on the respondent no. 8 i.e., the alleged contemnor is to comply with the order dated 2nd December, 2024 read with subsequent order dated 25th April, 2025 positively within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)