Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32385 (KAR)

P S PARASHURAM v. S YELLAMMA

CRP/48/2020 · 2025-02-12

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6276 CRP No. 48 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 48 OF 2020 BETWEEN: P S PARASHURAM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O BASANNA GOWDA, III CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577601. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. S YELLAMMA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, W/O R. RAJU RAO NEAR PERALA GUDI TEMPLE, BALLARI ROAD, CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. 2. S N MARUTHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O P S NAGENDRAPPA, 3. SHANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, W/O P S NAGENDRAPPA, 4. B SURESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6276 CRP No. 48 of 2020 S/O NAGAPPA BANAKAR, SL. NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE R/O PAMENAHALLI, SARATHI POST, HARIHARA TQ, DAVANAGERE DIST-577601. …RESPONDENTS R1 TO R3 SERVED – UNREPRESENTED V/O DT. 05.02.2021, NOTICE TO R4 IS D/W THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.10.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.18 IN OS NO.29/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., HARIHARA REJECTING THE IA NO.18 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 R/W.SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.29/2012 was decreed on 23.04.2021. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6276 CRP No. 48 of 2020 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL