Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32384 (AP)

SIKHAKOLLI BANGARU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24673/2023 · 2025-03-19

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24673 OF 2023 Between: Sikhakolli Bangaru, D/o. Ch. Rama Krishnaiah, Aged about 53 years Revenue Ward No.39, Main Road, I Town, Iron Center, 0pp. Masjid One Town, Vijayawada, NTR District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Department, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi , Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. The Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada Rep. by its Commissioner, I- Town, Vijayawada 3. The Station House Officer, One Town Police Station, One Town, Vijayawada-520 001 4. Muvvala Nuka Raju, S/o. Not known, Aged about 57 years, R/o. H.No.106, Street No.211, KL Rao Colony, Beside Door No. 13-839, Water Tank Lane, Undvalli Center, Sachivalayam Road, Guntur District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ Order or Direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in taking action against encroachment of the public road at door No.11-25-140, Opposite Masjid Road, Near Iron Center, Main Road, Ward No.?9,,, Ooe Town by installing a buddy and running hotel business and righXiflfront of the door step of the above said building and thereby causing ob?ft'U^on to the passers-by vehicular traffic and causing obstructions to the ing^ress and egress of the petitioner and her family members etc., by the 4th respondent herein, on the legal notice issued to the 2nd respondent dated 09.05.2022 and complaint lodged with the 3rd respondent dated 31.03.2022 as arbitrary , illegal and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take action against the encroachment of the public road and the buddy installed right infront of the door step of the petitioner by the 4th respondent forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to remove the obstruction being caused to the public and the petitioner and her family members and to the free flow of traffic by installing buddy/bunk and doing hotel business by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. Y SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRI M MANOHAR REDDY SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010478522023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24673/2023 Between: ...PETITIONER Sikhakolli Bangaru AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.YSU BRAHMAN YAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3.M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) The Court made the following: honourable SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY \A/PIT PETITION N0.24673 of 2023 THE ORDER: present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the action against the encroachment of the 1. The Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in not taking Opposite Masjid Road, Near Iron Center, wherein the Respondent No.4 public road at D.No.11-25-140, Main Road, Ward No.39,1 Town, Vijayawada had set up a small shop and running hotel business in of the Petitioner causing obstruction to their ingress and egress. in front of the door step , learned counsel for the Petitioner and ino for the Respondent No.2- Heard Sri Y. Subrahmanyam A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel appearing 2. Corporation. learned Standing Counsel on instructions submits that the push cart run by the Respondent No.4 07 05 2021 and again removed on 24.06.2021 & 04.02.2023 with the help of local police and the photographs to that effect were also passed on to the Court. The counsel for the Petitioner also admits that the push cart was removed and the grievance is redressed. At the time of hearing, the 3. was removed on i, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the authorities to ensure that the push cart is not placed by. the to the Petitioner. There shall be shall stand In view of the same 4. Respondent Respondent No.4 causing further grievance order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any no closed. Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE i OFFICER To, Municipal Department, State of Andhra Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur 1. The Principle Secretary Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, District. 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada Vijayawada. f . 3. The Station House Officer, One Town Police Station Vijayawada-520 001 4. One CC to Sri. Y Subrahmanyam Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri. M Manohar Reddy SC for Municipal Corporation [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Admin Urban Dev, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 8. Three CD Copies One Town, [OUT] GSC HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.24673 of 2023 K 0 3 An m Current Seeiion . \ DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS