Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32381 (AP)

B.Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary,

WP/27493/2015 · 2025-10-09

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010478192015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27493/2015 Between: 1. B.SRINIVASULU, S/O. B.OBANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: BRANCH MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF H.NO.22/35, KURUBA STREET, OLD TOWN, ANANTAPURAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.30, 3RD CROSS, BASAPPA LAYOUT, RAJARAGHURAM NAGAR, BANGALORE-98. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANANTAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to take possession of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.07 cents from out of the total extent of Ac. HN, J W.P.No.27493_2015 2 0.42 cents situated in Sy. No.180/5 of Anantapuram Town of the petitioner, without issuing any notice or initiating acquisition or requisiton proceedings or paying any comepnsation, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and is in negation of the established Judicial Precedents besides in violation of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from in violation of principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.42 cents situated in Sy. No.180/5 of Anantapuram Town, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 35706 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.42 cents situated in Sy. No.180/5 of Anantapuram Town pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) HN, J W.P.No.27493_2015 3 The Court made the following order: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh petition, if so required. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 10.10.2025 NKA HN, J W.P.No.27493_2015 4 91 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.27493 of 2015 Date: 10.10.2025 NKA