IN T 111 Asha Parm Sh. Harma SAS Nagar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceedings order dated this Court in State of Pun direction “… Nagar, Mo (Annexure P passed by t within a per the present learned Sta COCP-3725-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3725 of Date of decision : Parmar @ Asha Rani Versus armandeep Singh Hans, Senior Super Nagar, Mohali and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ramandeep Singh Gill, Adv Mr. Shivam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG P ASI Kewal Kumar and MHC Gu Mataur, SAS Nagar (Mohali). I GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti edings be initiated against the respond dated 05.2.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed ourt in CRM-M-211-2024 titled as “Ash of Punjab and others”, vide which the p “…..to respondent No.1 i.e. Senior S Mohali to consider and decide repr ure P-4), in the light of the order date by the Court of Additional Chief Jud a period of two months from the date o sent order, in accordance with law.” In pursuance of order dated 30. d State counsel has already filed the 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 725 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-10.02.2026 …..Petitioner Superintendent of Police, District …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA l, Advocate with AAG Punjab assisted by HC Gurmeet, Police Station petitioner submits that contempt espondents for not complying the passed by a Predecessor Bench of s “Asha Parmar alias Asha Rani vs. the petition was disposed of with ior Superintendent of Police, SAS representation dated 24.05.2023 dated 03.06.2023 (Annexure P-6) Judicial Magistrate, SAS Nagar te of receipt of a certified copy of 30.7.2025 passed by this Court, the Compliance Report dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 22.8.2025 b Superintend respondent refers to the “…with reg been carrie of the Invesr office….”. cause surviv fact and ad complied. petition may learned cou passed in accordingly February 10 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-3725-2025 (O & M) 025 by way of affidavit of Shri Harman intendent of Police, District SAS Nagar. ndent-State submits that necessary com to the Report (Annexure R-1/T), vide w regard to the said writ petition, the rried out, and since no further action nvesrtigating Officer, Annexure P-4 of . Learned counsel for the responden survives in the present contempt petition Learned counsel for the petition nd admits that the order dated 05.2.20 Accordingly, learned counsel subm on may be disposed of. In view of the above noted fac d counsel for the petitioner, no furthe d in the present contempt petition, dingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 10, 2026 Asija speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 armandeep Singh Hans, IPS, Senior agar. Learned counsel for the y compliance has been made and vide which, it has been opined that the necessary action has already tion is required, as per the report 4 of the writ petition is filed in the ondent submits that accordingly no etition. etitioner does not dispute the said 5.2.2024 (Annexure P-1) has been l submits that the present contempt ed facts and submissions made by further orders are required to be tition, the same is disposed of any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.12 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document