Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3238 (GAU)

Pesi Jilen v. Nyamar Karbak

IA(C)/214/2025 · 2026-05-17

Budi Habung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014302025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/214/2025 Pesi Jilen Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Nyamar Karbak Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Romjir Rakshap, Advocate for the Respondent : Jumge Karbak, Linked Case : Election Pet./6/2024 Nyamar Karbak Age: 43 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tumnya Karbak resident of Dego Kamki village PO and PS Kamba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Pesi Jilen Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Gepe Jilen resident of Ese Kerte Village PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 2/2 ------------ Advocate for : Marto Kato Advocate for : Romjir Rakshap appearing for Pesi Jilen: Advocate appearing for respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 18.05.2026 Heard Mr. Romjir Rakshap, learned counsel for the applicant/ returned candidate. Also heard Mr. Marto Kato, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/election petitioner. It is submitted at the Bar that by the lapse of time, this interlocutory application has become infructuous. In view of the above, the instant interlocutory application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant