2025:CGHC:31890 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7123 of 2025 Raju Lal Marko S/o Hira Lal Marko Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School Biharpur, Block - Manendragarh District Manendragarh - Chirmiri - Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 497442 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education Government Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh Raipur 2 - Joint Director Division Education Surguja Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District : Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Deo Office, District : Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Block Manendragarh, District : Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub - Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Tehsil - Manendragarh, District : Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10.07.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.11 12:03:44 +0530 Wps 7123 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not joined at his/her transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, he/she will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still wants to pursue his/her representation before the concerned authorities to redress his/her grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner is having any grievance, he/she may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his/her representation in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma