[2025:RJ-JP:24996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2342/2019 Pinki Lot W/o Shri Bala Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Opposite Aazad Park, Jawahar Lal Nehru Hospital Campus Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Amara Ram S/o Shri Kalla Ram, aged about 45 years R/o Dhob / Kawas Distt. Barmer At Present Working In Police Station Pachpadra, Distt. Barmer. 2. Budha Ram S/o Shri Dheera Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kharda Bharat Singh Police Station Gida Distt. Barmer. 3. Hariya @ Hari Ram S/o Shri Akha Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bhoogara Tehsil And Police Station Sher Garh Distt. Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saddik Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Gangwar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akash Saxena, Advocate on behalf of Mr. G.S. Sodhi, Advocate Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/07/2025 1. Instant revision petition is preferred by petitioner- complainant aggrieved from order dated 17.09.2019 in sessions case No. 20/2019 arising out of FIR No. 300/18, Police Station, Civil Lines, Ajmer passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Ajmer. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that police has filed a charge-sheet against Bhoma Ram but has not found any involvement of any other person. [2025:RJ-JP:24996] (2 of 3) [CRLR-2342/2019] 3. After filing of charge-sheet present petitioner-complainant has filed an application under Section 190/193 of Cr.P.C. and same was dismissed on 17.09.2019 by learned Trial Court. The petitioner-complainant has prayed to take cognizance against Amara Ram, Budha Ram and Hariya @ Hari Ram. 4. After considering submission of learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor, we have called a status report from learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases No.2, Ajmer about outcome of sessions case No. 20/2019. We are informed by a written report that Sessions Case No. 20/2019 is transferred to learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases No.2, Ajmer and after full trial accused Bhoma Ram was acquitted on 07.01.2023. 5. Since, main accused Bhoma Ram is acquitted by Trial Court and allegation in application indicate that complainant has alleged involevement of respondent(s)-accused on basis of conspiracy and abatement. The Trial Court has found that no evidence is available to take cognizance against the respondents who were not forwarded to face charges. Since, main accused is acquitted and after dismissal of application under Section 190/193 Cr.P.C., the next stage is under Section 319 Cr.P.C. 6. The main accused- Bhoma Ram is acquitted and a S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 350/2023 is pending before this Court, therefore, we have considered the grounds for taking cognizance on basis of material available and forwarded by police, with charge sheet. 7. Having gone through the material on record, there is no perversity or illegality in the order passed by the Trial Court and Trial Court has not committed any error as there is no ground for [2025:RJ-JP:24996] (3 of 3) [CRLR-2342/2019] taking cognizance against Amara Ram, Budha Ram and Hariya @ Hari Ram. 8. In view of aforesaid, instant S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2342/2019 sans merit and liable to be dismissed. 9. Accordingly, S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2342/2019 is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /119