Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32367 (BOM)

SUBHAN BURHAN TADVI THRU. POA HOLDER RAMJAN SUBHAN TADVI v. SALIM IMRAN TADVI (DEAD) THRU. LRS. ANIL SALIM TADVI AND OTHERS

CA/12836/2024 · 2025-03-21

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 96-ca-12836-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12836 OF 2024 IN CRAST/20363/2022 SUBHAN BURHAN TADVI THRU. POA HOLDER RAMJAN SUBHAN TADVI VERSUS SALIM IMRAN TADVI (DEAD) THRU. LRS. ANIL SALIM TADVI AND OTHERS ... Mr. Charuraj V. Borse h/f Mr. Vijay Bhalerao Patil, Advocate for Applicant. … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 21st MARCH, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. By this application, applicant seeks permission to bring on record legal representatives of deceased respondent-Salim Imran Tadvi, who died on 08.06.2024. The applicant also seeks to condone delay of 77 days caused in filing application. 3. Notice of this application is already served upon respondent nos.1 to 4/proposed legal representatives, however none appears. 4. Considering reasons as stated in application, sufficient cause is shown for delay. Hence, following order: ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (B), (C) and (D). b. Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from today. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/March-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:8781