1 2025:CGHC:10654 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3144 of 2020  Mahendra Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Padum Lal Dewangan, Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..............(Applicant) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Lokesh Shukla S/o Pramod Kumar Shukla, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..................(Returned Candidate) 2. Bhuwan Das Vaishnav, S/o Ganesh Das, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.................. (Contesting Candidate) 3. Bodhram Kesharwani S/o Shri Muritram, Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.................. (Contesting Candidate) 4. Durgesh Yadav S/o Jahangir Yadav, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.................. (Contesting Candidate) 5. Gajendra Narayan Aditya, S/o Shri Shyam Lal Kahara, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..................(Contesting Candidate) 6. Madhusudan Khunte S/o Shri Shiv Narayan Khunte Satnami, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..................(Contesting Candidate) 7. Radheshyam Sahu S/o Shri Dhanau Ram, Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Kera, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..................(Contesting Candidate) 8. Sita Sahu W/o Santosh Sahu, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Kera, SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.05 14:20:28 +0530 2 Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.................. (Contesting Candidate) 9. Returning Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh..............(Non-Applicant) 10. Sub Divisional Officer ( R)/ Specified Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : None, though served. For State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 05. 03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mr. Verma, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant