Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H T NARENDRAPRASAD
&
SRI. H PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, MEMBER
W.P. No.21667/2023 (GM-CPC) (Lok Adalat No.3936/2025) BETWEEN:
SMT. SUGUNAMMA W/O LATE D NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT DEVARAJAPALLI VILLAGE PATHAPALYA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 561207. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.ADINARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . SMT.KARUNAKUMAR W/O M G SURESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT MADDERI VILALGE THAYALURU HOBLI MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563131.
2 2 . SMT D N PRASHANTHI W/O RAMANJINEYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS THUNGETIDINNE VILLAGE PATHAPALY HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAUR DISTIRCT 561207.
3 . SRI N VIJAYA MADHUSUDHANA S/O LATE D NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT DEVARAJAPALLI VILLAGE PATHAPALYA HOBLI, BEGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAUPR DISTRICT 561207.
4 . SMT P S USHENDRAMANI W/O LATE SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT GULURU VILLAGE AND HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 561207.
5 . SMT D S SUKANYA W/O GOPALA KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT WARD NO 7, BAGEPALLI TOWN BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 561207.
6 . SMT P M SHAMANTHAKAMANI W/O THIPPANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT DEVARAJAPALLI VILLAGE PATHAPALYA HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 561207 …RESONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE FILE OF LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BAGEPALLI IN FDP NO.11/2013 AFTER PERUSING THE RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED: 30.05.2023, PASSED BY THE LEARNED
3 CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BAGEPALLI PASSED IN FDP.NO.11/2013 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:
CONCILIATION ORDER
In view of the order dated 02.03.2024, passed in F.D.P.No.11/2013, this writ petition does not survive for consideration.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- MEMBER
Cm/-