- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12593 RSA No. 1517 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1517/2012 (PAR/DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O BAJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 2. SRI. GOWDAPPA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/OF KONASAGARA VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK-577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. K. TEJASHWINI, ADV., FOR SRI. B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADV.,) AND: 1. SMT. SIDDAMMA W/O LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 2. SRI. RAJU S/O LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 3. SMT. MALLAKKA W/O CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12593 RSA No. 1517 of 2012 4. SRI. THIPPESWAMY S/O LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. ALL ARE R/OF KONDLAHALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522. 5. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O. NERALAGUNTE NAYAKANAHATTI HOBLI CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. 6. SRI. RUDRAPPA S/O KAMBADURU MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/OF. KONDLAHALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522. 7. SRI. KARIYANNA S/O KAMBADURU MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/OF. KONDLAHALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI H.K. ADV., FOR R1 TO R7) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE (FAST TRACK COURT) AT CHITRADURGA IN R.A.66/2011 DATED 21.02.2012 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AT CHALLAKERE IN O.S.NO.55/2007 DATED 9.8.2011 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12593 RSA No. 1517 of 2012 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants submits that he has no instructions. 2. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V. HOSMANI) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12