Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32355 (JHR)

AIRAAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7057/2025 · 2025-12-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:37323 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7057 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7057 of 2025 ---- 1. Airaan Khan, aged about 20 years, son of Noor Khan 2. Md. Kaif Khan @ Kaif Khan, age about 22 years, son of Nasim Khan 3. Arman Khan, age about 25 years, son of Late Manan Khan All are resident of village – Kheshkari, PO and PS – Jainagar, District – Koderma .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate ---- 02/11.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.11 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 307, 341, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. He further submits that there is direct allegation of assault against Arman Khan, who is petitioner No.3. He then submits that in identical situation one of the co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.4068 of 2024. 2025:JHHC:37323 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7057 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of assault and injury has also been received. 5. Considering that there is direct allegation of assault against petitioner No.3 namely Arman Khan and in view of that I am not inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.3 namely Arman Khan. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner No.3 namely Arman Khan is hereby rejected. 6. So far petitioner Nos.1, and 2 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegation against them and in view of that I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1, and 2 namely Airaan Khan and Md. Kaif Khan @ Kaif Khan respectively. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner Nos.1, and 2, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioner Nos.1, and 2, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.11 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 11.12.2025 Sangam/