Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32345 (RAJ)

NEERAJ KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAJARAM SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CW/21773/2018 · 2025-08-06

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30141] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21773/2018 1. Neeraj Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Rajaram Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Saket Colony, Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 2. Naveen Kuamr Dagur Son Of Shri Rajendra Prasad Dagur, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Khedi Hewat, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 3. Abhishek Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Mdan Lal Bhardwaj, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Modi Colony, Shri Mahaveer Ji, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. Sushil Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Shyam Murari Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Shyampur Moondri, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Akshay Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Girish Bhardwaj, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of E-121, Mohan Nagar, Hindun City, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Amit Kumar Gupta Son Of Shri Mukesh Gutpa, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Welfare Services, Govt. Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Medical And Health Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. Principal Medical Officer, Govt. Hospital, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Shri Ganesham Sewa Sansthan, Hindaun City, District Karauli Through Its President. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 06/08/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:30141] (2 of 2) [CW-21773/2018] Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this civil writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of their grievance(s). The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view thereof, the civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-129