Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32343 (RAJ)

KUNJ BIHARI PAREEK SON OF SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR PAREEK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17116/2024 · 2025-03-03

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9196] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17116/2024 1. Kunj Bihari Pareek Son Of Shri Shyamsundar Pareek, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Pareek Mohalla, Tunga Tehsil, Tunga District Jaipur 2. Ramesh Chand Gupta Son Of Radheyshyam Gupta, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 55 Bhatt Mohalla, Tunga Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 3. Revdmal Koli Son Of Panchuram Koli, Aged About 77 Years, Resident Of Koli Mohalla, Tunga Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 4. Pintu Meena Son Of Kaluram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Chholka Dhani, Himmatpura Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 5. Pooniram Sain Son Of Ramsahay Sain, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Sindoli Ki Dhani, Tunga Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur. 6. Laxman Sain Son Of Bhauri Lal Sain, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Badhwali Dhani Post Tunga Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Revenue Secretary, Revenue Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Magistrate, Jaipur. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Bassi, District Jaipur 4. Tehsildar Tunga, District Jaipur 5. Ramswaroop Sharma Son Of Ramdev Sharma, Resident Of Garh, Former Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Garh, Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur 6. Kundanmal Mahajan Son Of Chhitarmal Mahajan, Resident Of Tunga Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 7. Nandkishore Son Of Moolchand Khatik, Resident Of Garh Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 8. Mohan Lal Son Of Kanhaiyalal Dhanka, Resident Of Garh Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur 9. Shankar Lal Son Of Pratap Dhanka, Resident Of Garh Tehsil Tunga District Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Pareek For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:9196] (2 of 2) [CW-17116/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/03/2025 1. Six petitioners have filed this writ petition jointly, praying for removal of the encroachment raised by the private respondents on the public way. 2. Undisputedly, petitioners have filed this writ petition in the public interest, hence, counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a public interest litigation. 3. In such view, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /59