Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32342 (BOM)

CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WALUJ MAHANAGAR PRAKALP 1 CIDCO AURANGABAD v. BANSI MADHAVRAO SALE AND ANR

CA/12571/2024 · 2025-03-27

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 46-ca-12571-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12571 OF 2024 IN FAST/32066/2024 CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WALUJ MAHANAGAR PRAKALP 1 CIDCO AURANGABAD VERSUS BANSI MADHAVRAO SALE AND ANR ... Mr. Shambhuraje V Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. D. M. Pingale, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties. 2. By this application, applicants seek to condone delay of 86 days caused in fling Appeal. 3. Perused application and reasons as stated therein. Delay appears to have been occasioned on account of administrative exigency. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. Hence, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order: ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 86 days caused in filing Appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered subject. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/March-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:9165