1 2025:CGHC:36709 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7310 of 2025 1 - Smt. Gayatri Verma W/o Tikendra Kumar Verma, Aged About 43 Years Presently Working At Khokhopara, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector/ President, District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Distict Education Officer Cum Member Secretary, District Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has joined at her transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:04 +0530 2 Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, she will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still want to pursue her representation before the concerned authorities to redress her grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner is having any grievance, she may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on her representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee, the Committee shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/-Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok